1983 Toyota Celica GT-S - Message Forum (Re: RWD Celicas are not for racing!)

Forum

Home

This is an archived message.
The reply function is disabled.

[ Message Forum | Thread Index | Post a Reply ]

Re: RWD Celicas are not for racing!

Posted By:	Matt
Posted On:	February 17, 2003 at 11:36 pm GMST

Engine wise the 22r is not for racing. Neitehr is a Hyundai. A supra and 240 are build for power (some). The 22r has a hefty iron block bottom end and a good top end. But no stock car is good for racing. Thats why companies make dual valve springs, titanium retainers, headers low/high comp pistons, forged rods, cams, light cranks, flywheels, pulleys, larger t/b's. Springsets are available too as well as strut tower bars and lower conrtol arms. So what you say is true to some sort. The torque that the 2r produces outnumbers it's hp and there fore is good. if you dont like lke your car then sell it.

Replys:

Re: RWD Celicas are not for racing! - 85GTSConvert 02/18/03 (0)

Post a Reply:

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:	Matt wrote: > Engine wise the 22r is not for > racing. Neitehr is a Hyundai. > A supra and 240 are build for > power (some). The 22r has a h > efty iron block bottom end and > a good top end. But no stock > car is good for racing. Thats > why companies make dual valve > springs, titanium retainers, h > eaders low/high comp pistons, > forged rods, cams, light crank > s, flywheels, pulleys, larger > t/b's. Springsets are availabl > e too as well as strut tower b > ars and lower conrtol arms. So > what you say is true to some > sort. The torque that the 2r p > roduces outnumbers it's hp and > there fore is good. if you do > nt like lke your car then sell > it.
	Please click submit only once

Note: For security reasons your IP will be logged!